|
|
|
|
|
|
0 Replies and 7258 Views
ISCED 2011 7258 0
Started by SuperUser Account
Dear all,
I would just like to note that there has been a revision of the International Standard Classification of Education, the ISCED 2011. Because there seem to be some significant changes in the codings, I have explicitly referenced the 1997 standard in the EDU_LVL variable that was used in the proposal. The correspondence between codings of the top-level codes between the 1997 and 2011 standards is shown in table 19 on page 66 of http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/UNESCO_GC_36...
|
|
|
|
0 |
7258 |
13 Sep 2011 10:56 AM |
|
0 Replies and 7049 Views
HICDEP 1.50 released 7049 0
Started by SuperUser Account
Announcement: HICDEP 1.50 released
HICDEP 1.50 has been released on Sep 13 2011. This version features:
the new pediatric tables: tblPREG, tblPREG_OBS, tblPREG_OUT, tblDELIVERY_MUM, tblDELIVERY_CHILD, tblNEWBORN and tblNEWBORN_ABNORM.
a new table tblSAMPLES which holds information regarding sample storage.
an updated list of drugs tblART
The document is accessible via http://www....
|
|
|
|
0 |
7049 |
13 Sep 2011 12:00 AM |
|
0 Replies and 6994 Views
WP4 online survey tool - new version (30-jul-2011) 6994 0
Started by SuperUser Account
Please check the latest version of the online survey tool for task 4 of EuroCoord Work Package 4 (Data Inventory).
I think that all changes suggested during the last TC have been implemented except for the 'Finalize' button which will be inactive until we feed the database with a list of IDs and Passwords for the data managers.
The list with the lab tests has remained almost unchanged since it's an exact copy of what's in HICDEP right now. I discussed the c...
|
|
|
|
0 |
6994 |
30 Jul 2011 12:00 AM |
|
0 Replies and 6906 Views
WP4.4: New version of survey tool 6906 0
Started by SuperUser Account
Dear all,
Please check the current version of the online survey tool for task 4 of EuroCoord Work Package 4 (Data Inventory).
Changes compared to the previous version:
Less summary statistics
Added question for possible selection bias issues
Added set of questions for items not currently included in HICDEP
Modified (less strict) way of asking about overlaps
Drop-down lists replaced by radi...
|
|
|
|
0 |
6906 |
17 Jun 2011 12:00 AM |
|
3 Replies and 5574 Views
HICDEP release process 5574 3
Started by SuperUser Account
Hello everyone,
As Charlotte and Jesper pointed out at the last TC, the release process for new HICDEP versions is currently undocumented. I'm about to change that, here's what I came up so far:
roughly every year, the following happens:
4 weeks before a WP4 TC, I post a message to the discussion board stating that the version currently visible in the wiki is now considered a candidate for release as-is
WP4 members forward the message...
|
|
|
|
3 |
5574 |
by SuperUser Account 14 Jun 2011 12:00 AM |
|
2 Replies and 5576 Views
Paediatric tables / more design issues 5576 2
Started by SuperUser Account
Hello everybody,
I have discovered another issue with the pediatric tables and need your input to fix it the right way.
Problem: tblPREG had only MOTHER_ID as primary key. This implies that a woman can only get pregnant once.
Proposed fix: Add MENS_D (the date of the last known menstrual period) to tblPREG's primary key. This allows women to get pregnant multiple times. However, it requires also adding the MENS_D field to all tables which reference records in tblPREG, i.e. tblPREG...
|
|
|
|
2 |
5576 |
by SuperUser Account09 Jun 2011 12:00 AM |
|
3 Replies and 5566 Views
new variables for tblBAS, tblLTFU, tblLAB_VIRO 5566 3
Started by SuperUser Account
Hello everyone,
Sara Lodi has sent me a list of variables which CASCADE currently collects but which are not contained in the HICDEP standard. Some of them could be interesting to add, especially if other collaborations also collect them.
Questions to discuss are:
Which variables are commonly collected and therfore should be added to HICDEP
Should the variable be marked as additional or mandatory
Should more/other coding options be added for ca...
|
|
|
|
3 |
5566 |
by SuperUser Account02 Jun 2011 12:00 AM |
|
0 Replies and 7116 Views
Spam Bot Attacks 7116 0
Started by SuperUser Account
Hello everyone,
As you may have noticed, the discussion board has become more popular lately, at least concerning robots posting spam messages.
In order to combat this abuse, only users logged in can post messages to the forum for the time being. I will investigate whether we can use a captcha or another suitable mechanism in the future.
I apologise for the troubles caused.
Kind regards,
Simon
|
|
|
|
0 |
7116 |
01 Jun 2011 12:00 AM |
|
0 Replies and 6828 Views
tblSAMPLES - sample types 6828 0
Started by SuperUser Account
Hi everyone,
At the last TC, Yacine raised the issue that the sample types currently provided in tblSAMPLES is rather marginal. I agree with this, but it's hard to come up with a sensible list by myself, without knowing what other cohorts collect, so here is my question:
Do you know any types of samples (be it blood or other materials) that the cohorts collect but are not listed in tblSAMPLES
If yes, please let us know :)
Kind regards,
Simon
|
|
|
|
0 |
6828 |
09 May 2011 12:00 AM |
|
1 Replies and 5445 Views
Website moved to new infrastructure 5445 1
Started by SuperUser Account
The Quality Assurance check named ATC006 (AllTables/CrossTable/'Any fields not coded as coding lists on the table definition') I think needs to be more specific for the field being tested.
I was sitting with the DAD checks for the ART table– and we test both ART_RS and ART_ID for valid codes according to the table definitions. If a given record fails at least one of these checks then the error code ‘ATC006’ would not indicate which field failed.
Perhaps it could b...
|
|
|
|
1 |
5445 |
by SuperUser Account20 Apr 2011 12:00 AM |
|
2 Replies and 5556 Views
Task 4.4: Data Inventory Survey 5556 2
Started by SuperUser Account
Here is a temporary link ( http://195.134.113.76:8000/test3/survey.php ) for the Data Inventory Survey system I and Sara were working on.
The survey system is not complete; you will see there is a Tab labeled 'Data Collection (Non-HICDEP) which, at the moment, is empty but I'm about to start filling it with actual questions regarding items that are not yet included in the HICDEP tables. The page is hosted at my personal computer so forgive the strange looking link. Things will be prettier at...
|
|
|
|
2 |
5556 |
by SuperUser Account06 Apr 2011 12:00 AM |
|
2 Replies and 5460 Views
Suggestions/Questions for HICDEP Quality Assurance Checks 5460 2
Started by SuperUser Account
The Quality Assurance check named ATC006 (AllTables/CrossTable/'Any fields not coded as coding lists on the table definition') I think needs to be more specific for the field being tested.
I was sitting with the DAD checks for the ART table– and we test both ART_RS and ART_ID for valid codes according to the table definitions. If a given record fails at least one of these checks then the error code ‘ATC006’ would not indicate which field failed.
Perhaps it could b...
|
|
|
|
2 |
5460 |
by SuperUser Account05 Apr 2011 12:00 AM |
|
13 Replies and 5716 Views
Paediatric tables / design issues 5716 13
Started by SuperUser Account
Hi everybody,
I am currently including the paediatric tables (tblDELIVERY, tblNEWBORN, tblPREG, tblPREG_OBS and tblPregOut) into the HICDEP 1.50 draft. You can see the status quo in the above wiki articles.
One thing standing out to me is that they are not designed in a relational way. E.g. tblNEWBORN basically consists of 28 fields, a boolean and a free-text character field for every problem that can occur. This is ok if the data is recorded and fed into the database only once al...
|
|
|
|
13 |
5716 |
by SuperUser Account12 Feb 2011 12:00 AM |
|
0 Replies and 6923 Views
README 6923 0
Started by SuperUser Account
Welcome to HICDEP's discussion board
This board is a place to discuss changes in the HICDEP draft for a specific table/field or just the general format. Note that anyone is allowed to participate in the discussion. Inappropriate content will be deleted by the moderators without further notice.
You can subscribe to individual topics that you are interested in or the whole forum. Once subscribed, the discussion board will notify you via email about new topics or answers. Any act...
|
|
|
|
0 |
6923 |
31 Jan 2011 10:27 AM |
|
0 Replies and 1765 Views
Workshop in Paris - 6-7/12 Save the dates 1765 0
Started by SuperUser Account
The next workshop of the Eurocoord WP3 Methodology group will be organized in Paris Thursday/Friday 6-7th December 2012.
6th of December: Course by Cecile Proust-Lima on Latent Class Model
7th December: Workshop.
R Thiébaut
|
|
|
|
0 |
1765 |
01 Jan 2000 12:00 AM |